Die Kündigung eines Stiftungsvertrages, die der Beklagte ausgesprochen hatte, ist unwirksam. Dies hat der 16. Zivilsenat des OLG Celle festgestellt. Den Rest des Beitrags lesen »
Die Kündigung eines Stiftungsvertrages, die der Beklagte ausgesprochen hatte, ist unwirksam. Dies hat der 16. Zivilsenat des OLG Celle festgestellt. Den Rest des Beitrags lesen »
The European Court of Human Rights is holding a Grand Chamber hearing on Wednesday 2 March 2016 at 9.15 a.m. in the case of Lupeni Greek Catholic Parish and Others v. Romania (application no. 76943/11). The case concerns the claim for the restitution of a place of worship belonging to the Greek-Catholic Church that was transferred to the ownership of the Orthodox Church under the totalitarian regime. Den Rest des Beitrags lesen »
The European Court of Human Rights will be holding the following hearing in March 2016: Lupeni Greek-Catholic Parish and Others v. Romania (application no. 76943/11) concerning the restitution of places of worship belonging to the Greek-Catholic Church that were transferred to the ownership of the Orthodox Church under the totalitarian regime. After the hearing the Court will begin its deliberations, which will be held in private. Its ruling in the case will, however, be made at a later stage. Den Rest des Beitrags lesen »
The applicant is the Siseşti Parish of the Eastern-Rite Catholic Church, also known as the Greek-Catholic or Uniate Church. The case concerned an action to recover possession of property which had been confiscated from the Parish when the communist regime was established in 1948. Den Rest des Beitrags lesen »
The applicant is the Siseşti Parish of the Eastern-Rite Catholic Church, also known as the Greek-Catholic or Uniate Church. The case concerns an action to recover possession of property which had been confiscated from the Parish when the communist regime was established in 1948. Den Rest des Beitrags lesen »
At its last meeting (Monday 19 October 2015), the Grand Chamber panel of five judges decided to refer the following case to the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights: Lupeni Greek Catholic Parish and Others v. Romania (application no. 76943/11), concerning the restitution of places of worship belonging to the Greek Catholic Church which were transferred to the Orthodox Church under the totalitarian regime, and more specifically the question of the application of a special law to determine the legal status of such property. Den Rest des Beitrags lesen »
The European Court of Human Rights delivered its Chamber judgment in the case of Greek-Catholic Parish of Lupeni and Others v. Romania (application no. 76943/11). The case concerned the restitution of places of worship belonging to the Greek-Catholic Church which were transferred to the Orthodox Church under the totalitarian regime, and more specifically the question of the application of a special law to determine the legal status of such property. The Court held, unanimously, that there had been no violation of Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing) of the European Convention on Human Rights as regards the right of access to a court and the question of legal certainty, a violation of Article 6 § 1 concerning the length of proceedings, and no violation of Article 14 (prohibition of discrimination) in conjunction with Article 6 § 1 (right of access to a court). Den Rest des Beitrags lesen »
The applicants are the Greek-Catholic Parish of Lupeni (Romania), the Greek-Catholic Diocese of Lugoj (Romania) and the Greek-Catholic Archpriesthood of Lupeni. They belong to the Eastern-Rite Catholic (Greek-Catholic or Uniate) Church. The case concerns the restitution of religious sites belonging to the Greek-Catholic Church which were transferred to the Orthodox Church under the totalitarian regime, and more specifically the issue of implementing special legislation to determine the legal status of such property. Den Rest des Beitrags lesen »
Von Dr. Georg Neureither, Heidelberg
Juristische Begriffe irritieren das Publikum zuweilen auch deswegen, weil deren rechtlicher Sinngehalt vom allgemeinen Sprachgebrauch stark abweicht. So ist das auch mit der Erkenntnis, dass Juristen bei Art. 4 Abs. 1 und 2 GG offenbar zwischen einer guten und einer schlechten Religionsfreiheit unterscheiden – was in diesem Fall nicht nur das Publikum, sondern auch den Juristen irritierte, der sich dessen bis dato nicht bewusst war. Dazu eine erhellende Begebenheit vom Beisammensein am abendlichen Familientisch: Den Rest des Beitrags lesen »
In today’s Chamber judgment in the case of Sociedad Anónima del Ucieza v. Spain (application no. 38963/08) the European Court of Human Rights held, unanimously, that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights, and held by a majority, that there had been a violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention. The case concerned a dispute over ownership of a medieval church between the applicant company, which had purchased and registered in the land register a plot of land in which the church had formed an enclave, and the Diocese of Palencia, which had registered the same church in its own name in the land register sixteen years later. The applicant company therefore considered that it had been unfairly deprived of part of its property for no reason of public interest and without any compensation. Den Rest des Beitrags lesen »
The applicant company, Sociedad Anónima del Ucieza, is a limited company founded in 1978 under Spanish law, based in Ribas de Campos (Palencia). The case concerns the company’s ownership claim over religious buildings on a plot of land which had formerly belonged to the Catholic Church and which the company purchased at a public auction. Den Rest des Beitrags lesen »
The applicant, Rozalia Avram, is a Romanian national who was born in 1947 and lives in Arad (Romania). The case concerned a building which belonged to the Catholic diocese of Oradea and which was transferred to State ownership under legislation on prescription. Den Rest des Beitrags lesen »
The applicant, Rozalia Avram, is a Romanian national who was born in 1947 and lives in Arad (Romania). The case concerns a building which belonged to the Catholic diocese of Oradea and which was transferred to State ownership under legislation on prescription. Den Rest des Beitrags lesen »
The first applicant, the Reformed Church Foundation for Student Housing, is an NGO which was set up in 1992 and has its registered office in Odorheiul Secuiesc. The second applicant, Marinică Stanomirescu, is a Romanian national who was born in 1929 and died in 2009. In the first case, the applicant association, whose main activity is to promote pupils’ education in line with the doctrines of the Reformed Church, had obtained a final judicial decision on 5 October 2000, ordering the administrative authorities to destroy six buildings on its land (they had been put up to provide temporary homes for workers on a construction site then in progress). 12 years later, and after numerous attempts at enforcement, the administrative authorities refused to execute the final judicial decision in the applicant association’s favour. Den Rest des Beitrags lesen »
The first applicant, the Reformed Church Foundation for Student Housing, is an NGO which was set up in 1992 and has its registered office in Odorheiul Secuiesc. The second applicant, Marinică Stanomirescu, is a Romanian national who was born in 1929 and died in 2009. In the first case, the applicant association, whose main activity is to promote pupils’ education in line with the doctrines of the Reformed Church, had obtained a final judicial decision on 5 October 2000, ordering the administrative authorities to destroy six buildings on its land (they had been put up to provide temporary homes for workers on a construction site then in progress). 12 years later, and after numerous attempts at enforcement, the administrative authorities refused to execute the final judicial decision in the applicant association’s favour. Den Rest des Beitrags lesen »